GREE(SZ:000651) Qi Lu Wan Bao·2025-08-06 01:58Core Viewpoint - The case involving a defamatory statement attributed to Dong Mingzhu highlights the risks associated with misinformation and the reliance on AI for verifying information, which can lead to significant reputational damage for companies like Gree [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Case and Implications - A Shenzhen individual was sued for allegedly fabricating statements attributed to Dong Mingzhu, resulting in a court ruling that required an apology and compensation of 70,000 yuan to Gree [1]. - The case underscores the potential consequences of misinformation, as the individual claimed to have verified the information using AI tools, which raises concerns about the reliability of AI in discerning truth [1][2]. Group 2: AI and Misinformation - The National Security Department issued a warning about the risks of "data poisoning" in AI training, noting that even a small percentage of false data can significantly increase harmful outputs from AI models [2]. - The report from Tsinghua University indicated a rapid increase in AI-related rumors, particularly in the economic and corporate sectors, with a staggering growth rate of 99.91% in the last six months [3]. Group 3: Regulatory and Collaborative Efforts - The Central Cyberspace Administration of China initiated a campaign to combat misinformation spread by self-media, focusing on the use of AI to generate false information [2][3]. - Proposed regulations, such as the upcoming "Artificial Intelligence Generated Content Labeling Method," aim to ensure transparency in AI-generated content and mitigate the spread of misinformation [3].