扩内需与反“内卷”要双向发力（评论员观察）

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that healthy competition should focus on enhancing quality, innovation, and service rather than merely competing on price or market share [1][2] - The charging treasure industry is undergoing a transformation due to safety concerns, leading to a renewed focus on product quality after incidents of low-quality products causing fires [1] - The new energy vehicle sector is facing challenges such as price wars and unrealistic sales targets, necessitating a multi-faceted approach to restore rational competition [1] Group 2 - The article highlights the need for both government and enterprises to play a role in combating "involution" by ensuring fair competition and avoiding local protectionism [2] - Innovation is presented as a key strategy for companies to grow, with examples like Haier developing unique washing machines that address specific consumer pain points [2] - The article calls for a combination of strong regulatory measures and long-term mechanisms to promote fair competition and help businesses escape the cycle of "involution" [2] Group 3 - The need for dual efforts in expanding domestic demand and combating "involution" is emphasized, suggesting that healthy competition should be guided towards more orderly practices [3] - Various initiatives, such as the revision of the Price Law and discussions among express delivery companies, indicate a collective movement towards advocating for healthy competition [3] - The article suggests that creating innovative experiences and boosting consumer demand can provide new pathways to move away from "involution" [3]