Workflow
长期占领加沙:以色列的进退两难和难以收拾的残局
Yang Shi Wang·2025-08-07 06:17

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around Israel's intention to fully occupy the Gaza Strip, reflecting a more hardline and extreme policy stance [1][2] - Israel currently controls approximately 75% of the Gaza Strip and plans to submit a proposal for the complete occupation to the security cabinet [1] - The ongoing conflict has led to a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, with international calls for a two-state solution gaining momentum, particularly after recent conferences and recognitions of Palestinian statehood by various countries [3][7] Group 2 - Israel's military objectives in the Gaza conflict include rescuing hostages, eliminating Hamas, and ensuring that Gaza no longer poses a security threat, but these goals remain largely unachieved [5] - Despite military advantages, Israel faces significant internal and external challenges, including public protests against its policies and international condemnation due to humanitarian crises [6][5] - The complexity of the situation is heightened by the international community's increasing support for Palestinian statehood, which complicates Israel's long-term strategy in Gaza [8][9] Group 3 - The articles highlight the dilemma Israel faces regarding the governance of Gaza post-conflict, as international consensus favors Palestinian control, which Israel seeks to avoid [8][9] - Netanyahu's decision for long-term occupation is seen as an attempt to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, reflecting fears that a unified Palestinian governance would pose a greater threat than Hamas [9][10] - Historical context is provided, indicating that past Israeli occupations have not led to effective governance and have often resulted in increased resistance from the Palestinian population [10]