“又不是没进去过”，不能让校园霸凌者有下一次说出口的机会

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the ongoing issue of student bullying in China, emphasizing the inadequacies of the current juvenile justice system in addressing such behaviors, particularly regarding the leniency shown towards underage offenders [1][27]. Group 1: Case Study of Bullying Incident - A case involving a middle school student, Xiaorong, who was bullied and extorted for "protection fees" by a gang of peers, illustrates the severity of the bullying problem [3][4]. - The incident escalated to a robbery and assault on Xiaorong's father, leading to serious injuries, highlighting the violent nature of these bullying incidents [4][5]. - The case involved 13 minors, with 7 directly participating in the robbery and assault, and others acting as accomplices, indicating a broader issue of delinquency among youth [6][10]. Group 2: Intervention Mechanisms - The article discusses the tiered intervention mechanisms for juvenile offenders, which include educational and corrective measures based on the severity of their actions [7][10]. - For less severe cases, such as those involving minors who did not directly participate in violence, authorities may impose educational measures rather than punitive actions [8][10]. - The article emphasizes the need for state intervention when family-based corrective measures fail, as seen in the case of a minor who faced severe behavioral issues due to family dysfunction [11][12]. Group 3: Challenges in the System - The article outlines the challenges faced by specialized schools designed for juvenile rehabilitation, including a significant imbalance in the availability of such institutions across different regions [23][24]. - There is a noted shortage of resources, including qualified staff and adequate facilities, which hampers the effectiveness of these specialized schools [23][24]. - Parental resistance to sending children to specialized schools, often viewed as punitive, further complicates the situation, leading to a lack of necessary intervention for at-risk youth [24][28]. Group 4: Legal Framework and Execution - Recent legal reforms aim to strengthen the accountability of juvenile offenders and enhance the intervention mechanisms available to authorities [27][28]. - The article critiques the gap between legal provisions and their execution, as demonstrated by the lenient treatment of a 13-year-old offender in a bullying case, which reflects a broader issue of administrative complacency [27][29]. - The need for a more robust and effective deterrent system is emphasized, suggesting that increasing the number of specialized schools and improving public perception of these institutions could lead to better outcomes for juvenile offenders [28][29].