Group 1 - The U.S. is imposing a 50% tariff on India for purchasing Russian oil, while refraining from similar actions against China due to its strong position [1][3] - Navarro's comments indicate a cautious approach towards China, acknowledging the potential harm to U.S. interests if aggressive actions are taken [3][4] - The U.S. strategy towards China is complicated by the latter's ability to withstand tariffs and retaliate effectively, particularly through its control of rare earth elements [5][6] Group 2 - The differing responses to India and China highlight the power dynamics at play, with the U.S. adopting a bullying stance towards India while being more reserved with China [6][4] - India's attempts to compete with China are undermined by its lack of leverage in negotiations with the U.S., leading to a reliance on China for strategic positioning [6][4] - The perception of a "China exception" in U.S. trade policy reflects the recognition of China's unique economic and geopolitical significance [6][5]
“同样买俄油,为何特朗普制裁印度却放过中国?”“中国太强了”
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-08-07 22:20