RWA拥趸高呼“链上金融”热潮 摩根大通泼冷水：代币化尚未打动华尔街

Core Insights - The concept of Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization, which aims to place traditional assets like stocks and bonds on the blockchain, has not yet gained widespread acceptance among major institutional investors on Wall Street [1][4] - According to JPMorgan, the overall market for RWA tokenization is still small, valued at only $25 billion, with most activity driven by crypto-native companies rather than traditional financial institutions [1][3] - The main obstacles to RWA adoption include fragmented cross-border regulations, legal uncertainties, and limited trust in the executability of smart contracts [1][5] Group 1: RWA Tokenization Overview - RWA tokenization is promoted as a way to make financial market transactions faster, cheaper, and more transparent, but this vision largely remains theoretical [2][3] - The tokenization process involves creating blockchain-based representations of traditional financial assets, which can include government bonds, loans, and real estate [2][3] - Stablecoins have validated the on-chain payment pathways, with monthly settlement volumes reaching $650 billion to $700 billion, indicating a growing interest from traditional banks in issuing their own stablecoins [2] Group 2: Market Dynamics and Predictions - The World Economic Forum highlights that tokenization can provide a unified ledger, real-time settlement, and programmable attributes, thereby reducing settlement risks and increasing efficiency [3] - Predictions suggest that the scale of tokenized real-world assets could exceed $18 trillion by 2033, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 53% since 2025 [3] - Some traditional financial firms, such as Fidelity and VanEck, are beginning to experiment with RWA tokenization, indicating a cautious but growing interest in this area [3] Group 3: Challenges and Institutional Perspectives - Despite some initiatives, RWA adoption remains limited, with secondary market activities for tokenized bonds and private assets being very restricted [4][5] - Traditional investors perceive the utility of RWA tokenization as minimal, as the existing financial system is becoming faster and more efficient, reducing the demand for radical changes in settlement and trading [5] - Concerns about legal clarity, operational risks, and ecosystem fragmentation continue to hinder broader institutional adoption of RWA tokenization [5]