AI“黑箱”与老子的“道”：跨越2500年的惊人共鸣

Group 1 - The article discusses the concept of "Dao" as something that transcends language and rational understanding, suggesting that true knowledge cannot be fully articulated [1][2][12] - It draws parallels between the philosophical notion of "Dao" and modern physics, particularly quantum mechanics, highlighting the challenges in comprehending phenomena that defy intuitive understanding [3][10][11] - The article introduces the "black box" problem in AI, emphasizing that the complexity of AI models makes their decision-making processes difficult to explain, similar to the elusive nature of "Dao" [14][16][19] Group 2 - The article suggests that both "Dao" and AI's "black box" represent emergent properties that exceed human cognitive boundaries, indicating a need for trust rather than complete understanding [20][23][24] - It emphasizes the importance of collaboration between humans and AI, proposing that while AI can discover patterns, human experience and ethics remain essential in decision-making [26][29] - The article warns about potential biases in AI, advocating for data governance and ethical scrutiny to ensure fairness in AI outcomes [30][31]