Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the urgent need for the "Double Reduction" policy to alleviate the academic burden on students and address the issues of excessive extracurricular training and educational anxiety among parents [1][2][4] - The "Double Reduction" policy focuses on reducing both schoolwork and extracurricular training burdens, with a strong emphasis on reforming the education system and regulating the market for extracurricular training [2][5] - Various local governments, including Beijing and Guangdong, have begun implementing regulations to manage prepayment and advertising practices of extracurricular training institutions, indicating a coordinated effort to enforce the "Double Reduction" policy [2][3] Group 2 - Parents express significant concern regarding the "Double Reduction" policy, with many feeling pressured to enroll their children in multiple extracurricular classes to keep up with peers, leading to a cycle of educational anxiety [4][5] - The new regulations, including the revised "Minor Protection Law," align with the goals of the "Double Reduction" policy by prohibiting schools from conducting collective make-up classes during holidays and restricting early academic training for preschoolers [5][6] - The evaluation system for schools is undergoing reform to shift away from metrics solely based on academic performance, aiming to improve educational effectiveness and reduce the pressure on students [6]
校内校外双减负 入法加新规并行能解“鸡娃”焦虑?
Bei Jing Shang Bao·2025-08-08 06:59