雷少华：美国对华技术封锁为何注定失败？中国正在改写500年工业史的潜规则

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the U.S. has implemented a comprehensive industrial blockade against China since 2018, which is part of a historical pattern where leading nations impose restrictions on developing countries [1][2][3] - The U.S. blockade is not solely aimed at China but is a response to any rapidly developing nation that threatens the U.S. industrial dominance, following historical precedents like the U.S. blockade against the Soviet Union [2][3] - The blockade has intensified as China's development has accelerated, indicating that the U.S. perceives a significant threat to its technological and industrial leadership [3][10] Group 2 - The U.S. believes that by restricting advanced technologies, it can hinder China's overall industrial development, but this perspective is flawed as industries do not always require the most advanced technologies to thrive [6][10] - China's industrial strength lies in its comprehensive manufacturing system, which allows it to produce a wide range of products, from basic components to advanced technologies [9][11] - The U.S. blockade primarily targets high-end technologies, but China's extensive manufacturing capabilities ensure that it can still produce and innovate across various sectors [10][11] Group 3 - The U.S. GDP figures may appear strong, but a significant portion is derived from the service sector, which is dependent on a robust manufacturing base [12][14] - The manufacturing sector is considered the foundation of a nation's wealth and strength, and as China continues to develop its manufacturing capabilities, it is expected to challenge the U.S. service sector's dominance [12][14] - China's approach to development emphasizes sharing its technological advancements and infrastructure experiences with other countries, contrasting with the historical exploitative practices of Western nations [19][20] Group 4 - The current geopolitical landscape presents both challenges and opportunities for China, as the U.S. policies of decoupling and protectionism force China to develop a self-sufficient innovation system [20][21] - There is a growing consensus within China that core technologies cannot be acquired through external means, necessitating the establishment of a robust domestic technological and industrial framework [21] - China's strategy moving forward will focus on creating a larger, more stable market for innovation while promoting shared technological advancements with developing nations [21]