中美金融圈的两件大事
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-08-10 04:20

Group 1 - The Chinese government will resume the collection of value-added tax (VAT) on interest income from newly issued government bonds, local government bonds, and financial bonds starting from August 8, 2023, while existing bonds issued before this date will remain exempt until maturity [1][2] - This policy change is expected to increase the new issuance rates of government bonds, leading to higher interest expenses for the government, while simultaneously boosting VAT revenue [2][3] - The removal of tax exemptions will fundamentally alter the after-tax yield calculations for large institutional investors, such as banks and insurance companies, who previously relied on tax-free returns when investing in government bonds [4][5] Group 2 - The shift in tax policy indicates a gradual weakening of implicit guarantees and special privileges associated with Chinese government bonds, suggesting a move towards a more market-oriented and standardized bond market [5][6] - The restoration of VAT on bond interest will compel investors to focus more on the actual credit risks and fiscal health of bond issuers, particularly local governments, thus enhancing the credit risk pricing logic in the market [6][7] - This change is anticipated to reduce the "crowding out" effect on private investments, allowing market funds to be allocated more equitably between government projects and the private sector [7] Group 3 - In the U.S., the resignation of Federal Reserve Board member Adriana Kugler is set to take effect on August 8, 2023, with speculation that former President Trump may nominate a potential future chair to fill the vacancy [1][8] - The recent U.S. non-farm payroll data showed a significant downward revision, with July's job growth at only 73,000, far below market expectations, and the previous two months' data also revised down substantially [8][9] - Trump's reaction to the disappointing employment data indicates a desire to exert more control over the Federal Reserve, as he perceives the current economic conditions as an opportunity to influence monetary policy ahead of critical trade negotiations [10][11]