特朗普没料到，最后一天，多国站队中国，要让中国成为全球顶流？

Group 1 - The core argument of the articles highlights the contrasting approaches of the United States and China towards African countries, with the U.S. imposing tariffs while China offers zero tariffs, thereby enhancing its influence in the region [1][6][14] - The U.S. tariffs, which escalated from 10% to 41% on 69 countries, are characterized as a form of global coercion rather than mere trade disputes, reflecting a unilateral decision by the U.S. [3][4] - China's implementation of a 100% zero-tariff policy for 53 African nations is seen as a strategic move to foster deeper economic ties and cooperation, contrasting with the U.S. approach [6][8] Group 2 - The article discusses the shift in African countries' export strategies in response to U.S. tariffs, with nations like Lesotho and South Africa redirecting their trade towards China [11][13] - The trade dynamics between China and Africa are projected to grow significantly, with estimates suggesting a 12.4% increase in trade volume by 2025, while U.S.-Africa trade is expected to decline [9][14] - The narrative emphasizes a broader strategic shift in Africa towards seeking partnerships that align with their development goals, moving away from dependency on the U.S. [11][13]