Core Viewpoint - Oracle's dominance in the Chinese market has led to its eventual exit due to its refusal to adapt and respect local needs, resulting in a backlash from Chinese companies and a shift towards domestic alternatives [1][27]. Group 1: Oracle's Initial Success in China - Oracle entered the Chinese market in 1989, capitalizing on the financial system's information technology wave, quickly becoming the preferred choice for major banks with a 70% market share by 2000 [3][12]. - The company leveraged its advanced relational database technology, which was critical for Chinese financial institutions [3][5]. Group 2: Exploitative Practices - Oracle imposed exorbitant fees on Chinese companies, such as a 20% annual service fee on a 20 million yuan software contract with China Mobile, forcing companies to comply despite the high costs [5][7]. - Instances of punitive measures against companies that did not comply with Oracle's demands, such as fines imposed on China Unicom, highlighted Oracle's aggressive business tactics [7][9]. Group 3: Chinese Companies' Response - The turning point for Chinese companies came in 2008 when Alibaba, facing Oracle's price hikes, decided to develop its own database, OceanBase, which later outperformed Oracle's technology [14][15]. - Other companies like Huawei and Tencent followed suit, creating competitive products that addressed the limitations of Oracle's centralized architecture [19][21]. Group 4: Policy Changes and Market Shift - Government policies mandated a shift towards domestic software, with a requirement for a minimum of 70% procurement of local software, significantly reducing Oracle's market share in key government projects [21][25]. - By 2024, domestic databases captured 80% of the market, while Oracle's share plummeted to 5% [25]. Group 5: Oracle's Decline - Oracle's refusal to acknowledge its declining position led to further isolation, including lawsuits against Chinese tech firms for alleged intellectual property theft [27][30]. - The company's global market share fell to 5% by 2024, with significant losses in key contracts, including a $100 billion cloud computing bid from the U.S. Department of Defense [30][32].
被踢出中国市场,曾垄断中国30年,却扬言绝不培养中国员工