《纽约时报》们围攻PerplexityAI，“今日头条版权门”再度上演？

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around traditional media accusing Perplexity AI of using copyrighted materials without permission, leading to a significant conflict between established media and emerging AI companies [1][2][17] - Perplexity AI is positioned as an "answer engine" rather than a traditional search engine, fundamentally changing how users access information by providing direct answers instead of links [6][10][11] - The convenience offered by Perplexity AI poses a threat to traditional media's business models, as it diminishes the need for users to visit original content sources, impacting traffic and advertising revenue [14][22] Group 2 - The controversy surrounding Perplexity AI reflects broader issues within the AI industry, where similar disputes over copyright and data usage have emerged, affecting various sectors including literature and art [18][21][23] - Perplexity AI's data scraping methods have raised ethical concerns, as it allegedly bypasses website restrictions to gather protected content, leading to legal actions from media companies [16][22] - The ongoing legal battles highlight the need for a standardized framework for data usage and sharing in the AI industry, potentially drawing from existing models in the music industry to ensure fair compensation for content creators [27]