重新体验 GPT-5 后，我想它比 GPT-4o 更需要一场葬礼

Core Insights - The release of GPT-5 has not met user expectations, leading to disappointment compared to its predecessor, GPT-4o [1][10][96] - OpenAI has reintroduced GPT-4o in response to user feedback, indicating dissatisfaction with GPT-5 [2][10] Performance Comparison - GPT-5 performs better in technical tasks such as programming, while it struggles with tasks requiring human-like understanding and emotional nuance, where GPT-4o excels [10][11] - Users have reported inconsistent logical reasoning in GPT-5, with some tasks being solved correctly while others are not, highlighting reliability issues [10][11][55] - Creative outputs from GPT-5 have not shown significant improvement over GPT-4o, often resulting in formulaic responses lacking originality [10][11][70] User Experience - The interaction experience with GPT-5 has been described as more robotic and less empathetic, leading to a less engaging user experience [10][11][88] - Users have noted that GPT-5's responses can feel overly analytical, lacking the warmth and relatability found in GPT-4o's outputs [10][11][88] Task-Specific Insights - In productivity tasks, GPT-5 is perceived as more rational but less personable, making it less suitable for tasks like email writing compared to GPT-4o [10][15] - The models were tested across various scenarios, revealing that while GPT-5 has strengths in STEM-related tasks, it falls short in everyday conversational and creative contexts [10][12][13] Conclusion - Overall, the advancements in GPT-5 do not justify its designation as a major upgrade, with many users expressing a preference for the capabilities of GPT-4o [10][96]