重新体验GPT-5后，我想它比GPT-4o更需要一场葬礼

Core Insights - The release of GPT-5 has not met user expectations, leading to disappointment compared to its predecessor GPT-4o [1][14][106] - OpenAI has reintroduced GPT-4o due to user demand, indicating dissatisfaction with GPT-5 [2][6][108] Performance Comparison - GPT-5 performs better in technical tasks but struggles with tasks requiring human-like understanding and emotional nuance, making it less effective for everyday productivity tasks [16][20][22] - In creative tasks, GPT-5 has not shown significant improvement over GPT-4o, producing formulaic outputs lacking originality [18][80] - User experience with GPT-5 is perceived as less empathetic and more robotic, affecting its ability to engage in meaningful conversations [19][91][98] Testing Methodology - A rigorous testing process was designed to compare GPT-5 and GPT-4o across various tasks, focusing on speed, accuracy, usability, and user experience [10][11][12] - The tests included generating emails, data analysis, and creative writing, with results documented for direct comparison [9][21][33] User Feedback - Users have expressed frustration with GPT-5's performance, often stating it is less useful than GPT-4o, leading to a metaphorical "funeral" for the older model [4][5][107] - The community's reaction has been overwhelmingly critical, with many users preferring the older model for its reliability and effectiveness [7][8][108] Conclusion - The overall sentiment is that GPT-5, while faster, does not provide a substantial upgrade over GPT-4o, leading to calls for a reassessment of its capabilities and user experience [14][106][110]