GPT-5惹争议，奥尔特曼：别再纠结“是不是AGI”

Core Insights - The definition of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is becoming increasingly ambiguous as the AI field evolves, according to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman [2] - OpenAI's latest model, GPT-5, is seen as an incremental upgrade rather than a revolutionary change, leading to mixed user reactions [4][3] - There is a growing sentiment that the focus on AGI may distract from tangible advancements in specialized AI capabilities [5][3] Group 1: AGI Definition and Perspectives - Altman believes that the term AGI is not particularly useful, as different entities have varying definitions of it, complicating the discourse [2] - Nick Patience from Futurum Group argues that while AGI is an inspiring concept, its vague definition often obscures real progress in specialized AI [3] - OpenAI's valuation has reached $300 billion, with plans for a secondary stock sale at a $500 billion valuation, driven by the promise of achieving AGI [3] Group 2: GPT-5 Model Reception - The launch of GPT-5 has received lukewarm responses from users, many of whom preferred the previous model, GPT-4o, for its emotional connection [4] - Critics describe GPT-5 as a gradual update rather than a groundbreaking innovation, highlighting its limitations in dialogue style and creative writing [4] - Altman acknowledges that GPT-5 is still far from achieving AGI, as it cannot learn autonomously and continuously [4] Group 3: Future Focus and Industry Trends - Altman suggests that instead of debating whether a system has achieved AGI, it is more productive to assess its progress along the path to general intelligence [5] - The industry is encouraged to focus on specific advancements in AI capabilities rather than the nebulous concept of AGI, which may serve as a distraction [5]