钟薛高创始人谈百果园董事长争议言论：表述方式让人不太舒服，但相信没有恶意

Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy surrounding Baiguoyuan's pricing strategy and its CEO's comments has sparked significant public debate, highlighting the challenges faced by companies in balancing quality and consumer expectations [3][4]. Group 1: Baiguoyuan's Position and Strategy - Baiguoyuan's chairman, Yu Huiyong, stated that the company will not cater to consumer demands, emphasizing a commitment to high-quality fruits and consumer education [3]. - The company claims to have millions of members who recognize its value and are willing to pay for premium products, indicating a loyal customer base [3]. - However, the high pricing strategy has led to public backlash, with consumers expressing concerns over affordability and perceived value [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Market Challenges - Baiguoyuan reported a 9.8% year-on-year decline in revenue for 2024, marking its first net loss in five years, alongside a reduction in store numbers [4]. - The company's insistence on "educating consumers" raises questions about its understanding of market demands and consumer needs, especially in a competitive landscape [4]. - The current economic climate, where consumers prioritize cost-effectiveness, poses significant challenges to Baiguoyuan's high-price strategy [3][4]. Group 3: Industry Context and Comparisons - The situation with Baiguoyuan is reminiscent of the challenges faced by other companies like Zhong Xue Gao, which has recently encountered financial difficulties and public scrutiny over its pricing and product quality [5][6]. - Zhong Xue Gao's founder acknowledged operational issues leading to financial strain, reflecting broader industry challenges related to consumer perception and market positioning [10]. - The trend of companies attempting to "educate" consumers has often backfired, as seen in various cases within the industry, suggesting a need for a more consumer-centric approach [4][6].