稀土战争中国完胜！西方三大指控破产，军用管制真相曝光：自卫而非霸权！

Group 1 - The article critiques German media for accusing China of environmental harm and resource monopolization in the context of rare earth elements, suggesting that these claims are a form of deflection from their own shortcomings in the industry [1][3][4] - China has made significant advancements in green mining technology, reducing the use of extraction agents by 80% and nitrogen emissions by 95%, which contrasts sharply with the practices of Western countries that outsource pollution [3][4][6] - The article highlights that Western countries, including Germany, lack the technological capability and willingness to mine rare earths, instead using "environmental concerns" as a cover for their inability to compete [6][8] Group 2 - The narrative that other countries refrain from mining rare earths due to high environmental standards is dismissed as self-deception, with examples of failed mining operations in Australia and the U.S. illustrating the real challenges faced [6][8][10] - China's control over rare earth exports is framed as a defensive measure rather than coercion, particularly in light of military applications of these materials that could threaten national security [8][10][12] - The article asserts that the global order is shifting, with China's technological advancements in rare earth processing and military applications necessitating a reevaluation of international relations and trade practices [12][13] Group 3 - China's share of global rare earth production has decreased from 90% to 70%, attributed to its focus on technological innovation rather than resource monopolization, with a significant portion of green patents held by Chinese companies [13] - The article emphasizes the importance of military security in the context of rare earth elements, indicating that China's export controls are aligned with national defense strategies [13] - The potential for collaboration with Western countries is mentioned, contingent upon the cessation of sanctions and double standards, suggesting that mutual interests could lead to joint ventures in rare earth production [13]