中方已经点头，美国还没签字？特朗普提出新条件，要求扩大进口

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing negotiations between China and the U.S. regarding the extension of the tariff suspension agreement, highlighting the complexities and new conditions introduced by the Trump administration, which complicate the negotiation process [3][5][21]. Group 1: Tariff Suspension Agreement - The original tariff suspension agreement was set to expire on August 12, but the U.S. did not provide a clear response until the last moment, reflecting a typical negotiation tactic of the Trump administration [3]. - During the July meeting in Stockholm, both sides had agreed to extend the suspension for another 90 days, but Trump introduced new conditions just before the deadline [5]. - The final agreement resulted in a 90-day suspension of 24% tariffs while retaining 10% tariffs, indicating a new balance in U.S.-China relations under current power dynamics [21][25]. Group 2: New Conditions and Responses - Trump demanded that China further open its rare earth exports and threatened to impose a 300% tariff on Chinese goods if China did not stop purchasing Russian oil [5][15]. - China's response was measured yet firm, emphasizing that while they were open to discussing the extension, they would not accept additional conditions [11][25]. - China maintains strict control over rare earth exports, allowing only limited access for civilian use while retaining control over military-related materials [13][19]. Group 3: Strategic Considerations - China's strategy includes ensuring its dominance in rare earth refining, which is crucial for U.S. military technology, while also responding to U.S. threats by increasing oil imports from Russia [15][19]. - The U.S. average tariff rate has risen to 18.3%, the highest since 1934, and further increases could lead to inflation, impacting Trump's political standing ahead of the 2026 elections [23]. - The ongoing negotiations reflect a broader clash of development models, with the U.S. attempting to revert China to a pre-2018 open state, while China pursues a dual strategy of self-reliance and global cooperation [29][31].