Hua Er Jie Jian Wen·2025-08-13 19:54Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government's unprecedented revenue-sharing agreement with AI chip giants Nvidia and AMD, requiring them to pay 15% of their sales revenue from China in exchange for export licenses, may serve as a model for other industries in the future [1][2]. Group 1: Revenue Sharing Model - The revenue-sharing model disrupts traditional practices by requiring chip manufacturers to share a portion of their sales revenue from China to obtain export licenses [2]. - Nvidia and AMD have agreed to pay 15% of their sales revenue from specific chips (H20 for Nvidia and MI308 for AMD) to the U.S. government [1][2]. - This approach aligns with the Trump administration's strategy of demanding specific actions from companies, such as investments in the U.S., in exchange for benefits like tariff exemptions [2]. Group 2: National Security Concerns - U.S. Treasury Secretary Becerra downplayed concerns that the revenue-sharing arrangement poses national security risks, stating that the semiconductor products involved are of a lower tier and do not include advanced chips [3]. - The H20 chip, designed specifically for the Chinese market, is less powerful than Nvidia's mainstream GPU chips and was previously banned for export to certain countries, including China, due to national security concerns [3]. Group 3: Market Impact and Policy Considerations - Allowing Nvidia to sell the H20 chip in China could position the company as a leader in Chinese technology and provide significant revenue opportunities, potentially unlocking billions in sales [5]. - Prior to its ban, Nvidia had projected quarterly sales of over $8 billion for the H20 chip, indicating substantial market potential [5]. - Comments from Trump and Becerra suggest a possible policy reversal compared to the Biden administration's stricter measures, which made it more difficult for China to access advanced chips [5].