原创作品被判定AI生成，平台怎么防止“冤假错案”

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the misclassification of human-generated content as AI-generated, leading to significant consequences for creators [1][2] - A landmark case in Beijing highlighted the legal implications of such misclassification, where a user's comment was wrongly flagged as AI-generated, resulting in a court ruling that emphasized the need for platforms to provide reasonable grounds for their decisions [2][5] - The case reflects broader concerns about the role of algorithms in content moderation and the need for transparency and accountability in AI systems [3][4] Group 2 - The rise of AI-generated content has prompted educational institutions to implement strict regulations, such as AI detection thresholds for academic papers, which have proven to be inaccurate [3][4] - Recent regulations from Chinese authorities require AI models to label generated content, yet the complexity of real-world applications poses challenges for effective enforcement [4][5] - The balance of power and responsibility between platforms and users is crucial, as platforms are recognized as gatekeepers but must also be held accountable for their algorithmic decisions [5][6]