Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the salary proposal of Yoon Yong-jo, chairman of the robotics company Berante, highlights the increasing scrutiny of executive compensation in loss-making companies amid regulatory reforms aimed at improving corporate governance [1][5][12]. Group 1: Salary Proposal and Board Rejection - Yoon Yong-jo proposed a fixed monthly salary of 2 million yuan and an annual bonus based on "company profit - 1 yuan," which was rejected by the board [1][3]. - The board's rejection was influenced by the company's current loss status, with directors arguing that salary increases should only be considered after the company returns to profitability [3][5]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Berante's financial performance has been declining, with a reported revenue of 177.36 million yuan in the first half of 2025, a decrease of 17.84% year-on-year, and a net loss of 39.42 million yuan [4][3]. - The company has faced significant losses in recent years, with net profits of -125.39 million yuan in 2023 and -55.47 million yuan in 2022 [2][3]. Group 3: Regulatory Context - The controversy occurs against the backdrop of the China Securities Regulatory Commission's new guidelines aimed at tightening executive compensation structures, particularly for loss-making companies [5][7]. - The revised corporate governance guidelines emphasize that executive compensation should align with company performance and sustainability, particularly for companies reporting losses [7][12]. Group 4: Shareholder Concerns and Governance Issues - Shareholders, particularly minority shareholders, have expressed concerns over governance issues, including the perceived self-serving nature of Yoon Yong-jo's salary proposal [8][9]. - A significant shareholder has called for amendments to the company's articles of association to restore normal governance structures and address the concentration of power within the company [8][9]. Group 5: Historical Context and Company Background - Berante, founded in 2008, has faced challenges in recent years, including being delisted from the New Third Board due to audit issues [10]. - The company has a history of receiving "unable to express an opinion" audit reports, which has severely impacted its market reputation and operational performance [10].
亏损期逆势提薪引争议:伯朗特董事长200万天价薪酬提案遭否,触碰上市公司治理准则底线
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-08-14 11:56