巴西打回美国关税函，称错误且有冒犯性，特朗普：不想和卢拉说话

Core Viewpoint - Brazil has rejected a tariff threat from the United States, claiming the content is inaccurate and offensive, marking a significant pushback against U.S. trade policies [1][3] Group 1: U.S.-Brazil Trade Relations - The U.S. threatened to impose a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods, citing unfair trade practices, despite a cumulative trade surplus of $410 billion in favor of the U.S. over the past 15 years [3][5] - Brazil's President Lula responded strongly, asserting that no foreign entity can dictate terms to the Brazilian government [5][7] Group 2: Brazil's Economic Position - Lula emphasized that U.S.-Brazil trade constitutes only 1.7% of Brazil's GDP, indicating that Brazil can thrive without U.S. trade [7] - Brazil is a major exporter of agricultural and mineral products, with strong economic ties to China and support from BRICS nations, providing a robust economic foundation [7][11] Group 3: International Reactions and Implications - The U.S. tariff threat has led to a lawsuit from an American orange juice importer, highlighting the negative impact of such tariffs on U.S. businesses [9] - Brazil has filed a complaint with the WTO against the U.S. for its tariff actions, receiving support from 40 countries, including all 27 EU member states, indicating widespread discontent with U.S. unilateralism [9][11] Group 4: Shift in Global Trade Dynamics - The incident illustrates that U.S. tariff threats are no longer universally effective, as Brazil's rejection may encourage other nations to adopt a similar stance [11][13] - The event signifies a shift towards a multipolar world, where cooperation among developing nations is reshaping international relations and diminishing U.S. dominance [11][13]