特朗普想用关税还债？恐怕连利息都还不起！

Core Points - President Trump's dual plan for tariff revenue includes repaying the $37 trillion national debt and potentially distributing part of the revenue to the public [1] - Current tariff revenue is insufficient to cover interest payments on the national debt, with July interest payments totaling $60.95 billion compared to tariff revenue of $29.6 billion [2] - Economic optimism exists regarding the ability to manage debt through growth, but warnings from key financial figures indicate potential risks [2][5] Group 1 - Trump's tariffs are expected to generate significant revenue, but experts argue that this revenue will not substantially reduce the national debt [4][5] - The White House claims that the debt-to-GDP ratio has decreased since Trump's presidency, attributing this to growth policies and tariff revenue [4] - Economic analysts express skepticism about the feasibility of using tariff revenue to repay debt, emphasizing the need for substantial annual borrowing [5] Group 2 - Concerns about the U.S. debt situation are heightened by the reliance on foreign investors, with approximately 26% of U.S. debt held by them [6] - Market confidence in U.S. debt remains stable, as evidenced by consistent bond yields, despite skepticism about unconventional debt management strategies [6] - The debate continues over who ultimately bears the cost of tariffs, with differing views on whether foreign entities or American consumers will shoulder the burden [7] Group 3 - The ongoing debt issue is characterized as a "coward's game," with successive governments increasing debt without implementing unpopular policies to address it [7] - A report from the Conference Board suggests that a debt crisis is imminent, proposing a six-year plan to reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio significantly [8]