《东极岛》不差

Core Viewpoint - The film "Dongji Island" is a genuine work that does not exaggerate its narrative and is expected to achieve a box office between 2.5 billion to 3 billion [1] Group 1: Film Comparison - The negative public sentiment towards "Dongji Island" is largely unfounded and stems from external influences, such as the "Japanese Foreign Ministry" [2] - The distinction between public opinion and the quality of a work is crucial; negative opinions do not necessarily reflect the film's merit [3] - "Dongji Island" and "Lisbon Maru" are both good films, but they serve different purposes: the former is a narrative film while the latter is a documentary [5] Group 2: Historical Accuracy - "Dongji Island" adheres to historical facts in four key aspects: the sinking of the Lisbon Maru, the self-rescue of British soldiers, the shooting of prisoners by the Japanese, and the rescue efforts by fishermen [11] - The film successfully incorporates elements from "Lisbon Maru," such as Morse code signaling and the portrayal of military discipline among the prisoners [12] - Criticism of "Dongji Island" based on documentary standards is inappropriate, as narrative films and documentaries have different storytelling methods [14] Group 3: Cultural Perspective - "Dongji Island" challenges Western centrism by focusing on the Chinese fishermen's perspective, which is often overlooked in traditional narratives [34][46] - The film provides a new viewpoint on anti-war narratives by emphasizing the moral awakening of the fishermen during wartime [47] - The cultural value of "Dongji Island" surpasses that of "Lisbon Maru" by centering on the Chinese narrative, which has been largely ignored [46]