Group 1 - The core conflict between the parties revolves around the legitimacy of a 5 million yuan "severance fee" and a 500,000 yuan commercial cooperation deal, with accusations of personal attacks and manipulation of evaluation results [2][6][9] - The evaluation video by influencer @楼斌Robin sparked the dispute, highlighting that the higher-priced Leifen razor (699 yuan) was compared unfavorably against the lower-priced Feike razor (399 yuan) [5][10] - Leifen's CEO Ye Hongxin accused former employee Pan Jian of colluding with internal staff to inflate project costs and of benefiting from negative publicity against Leifen [6][9] Group 2 - Leifen stated that Pan Jian's equity agreement had specific conditions for effectiveness, and his departure was partly due to not meeting these conditions [9] - The company possesses recorded evidence regarding the disputed 500,000 yuan commercial deal and plans to disclose it based on circumstances [10] - The small appliance industry is facing intense competition due to technology homogenization and cross-category operations, making product strength a key differentiator [11]
知名品牌CEO和前员工互怼,牵出500万“分手费”
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-08-19 00:33