吃饭又砸锅？欧洲可不干！美国财长威胁对华加税200%，G7无人响应

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the increasing tensions between the U.S. and its allies regarding tariffs on countries purchasing Russian energy, with U.S. Treasury Secretary Besant threatening higher tariffs as a negotiation tactic [1][2] - The silence from G7 leaders during Besant's proposal for a 200% tariff on China indicates their reluctance to support U.S. measures that could jeopardize their own economic interests, particularly in relation to their trade ties with China [2][3] - The articles highlight a shift in global economic dynamics, where countries are less reliant on the U.S. and more focused on their own interests and relationships with China, reflecting a decline in U.S. influence within the G7 [3][6] Group 2 - The U.S. strategy of imposing tariffs to suppress China's economic growth is seen as a way to deflect attention from domestic economic issues, such as job shortages and industrial decline [2][4] - The potential for retaliatory measures from China could pose significant risks to U.S. companies that depend on the Chinese market, suggesting that U.S. policies may backfire and harm its own economy [4][6] - The articles argue for a return to principles of free and fair trade, emphasizing that unilateral actions by the U.S. could disrupt global supply chains and lead to increased costs for consumers [3][6]