3 6 Ke·2025-08-19 11:05Core Points - The article discusses the recent developments in social security for delivery riders in China, particularly focusing on JD.com's initiative to provide social insurance for its riders, which has prompted other platforms like Meituan and Ele.me to follow suit [1][6][11] - The implementation of social security for delivery riders is seen as a significant step towards improving labor rights and protections for the growing gig economy in China, where over 200 million flexible workers exist [1][21] Group 1: JD.com's Initiative - JD.com has become the first platform in China to provide full social insurance coverage for its full-time delivery riders, with over 150,000 riders benefiting from this initiative [1][6] - The average monthly social insurance contribution per rider is approximately 2,000 yuan, with JD.com covering both the employer and employee portions [1][6] - Despite the significant costs, JD.com reported a 199% year-on-year revenue growth in its new business segment, including delivery services, although it also faced increased operating losses [6][7] Group 2: Industry Trends - Other major platforms like Meituan and Ele.me are also beginning to implement social security measures for their riders, with Meituan planning to cover all full-time and stable part-time riders by mid-2025 [11][12] - The social security issue for delivery riders is part of a broader trend in China, where the government is tightening regulations to ensure that employers cannot evade social insurance obligations [2][3][22] - The new judicial interpretation emphasizes that any agreement to not pay social insurance is invalid, reinforcing the need for platforms to comply with social security laws [2][22] Group 3: Challenges and Considerations - The transition to providing social security for over 10 million delivery riders is complex, involving rider willingness, platform costs, and potential cost transfers to merchants and consumers [11][20] - Many riders express a lack of interest in social security due to high personal contributions and bureaucratic hurdles, with a significant percentage unwilling to pay the current rates [16][19] - The article highlights the need for reforms in the social security system to accommodate the unique circumstances of gig economy workers, such as flexible contribution levels and portability of benefits [22]