无人机喷洒农药“误伤”相邻农田 怎么赔偿？

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled that the parties involved in the drone pesticide spraying incident are liable for damages due to negligence, with a compensation amount of 31,000 yuan to the affected farmers [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A case was adjudicated in Urumqi, Xinjiang, where improper pesticide spraying by a drone led to significant damage to neighboring farmland, specifically 20 acres of winter melons [1]. - The affected farmers, Xiao Long and Xiao Niu, sought compensation after their crops exhibited severe damage, which was confirmed to be linked to the pesticide application [1][2]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The court identified two main issues: the causal relationship between the pesticide spraying and the crop damage, and the liability of the parties involved [2]. - The court accepted the findings of a qualified assessment agency that established a causal link between the drone's pesticide application and the damage to the winter melons [2]. Group 3: Liability and Compensation - Both Xiao Hu (the contractor) and Xiao Yang (the drone operator) were found to have acted negligently, leading to the court's decision to hold them each responsible for 50% of the compensation [2]. - The ruling emphasized that Xiao Yang failed to exercise due caution during the pesticide application, while Xiao Hu did not adequately inform neighboring farmers about the spraying [2].