鲍威尔执掌的美联储确实犯错了，但问题不在于不降息

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for a more thoughtful selection process for the next Federal Reserve Chair, focusing on improving the Fed's overall performance and accountability rather than short-term market considerations [1][2]. Group 1: Federal Reserve's Current Challenges - President Trump has called for significant cuts to the federal funds rate to stimulate economic activity, which could lead to excessive inflationary monetary policy and increase borrowing costs for the government, households, and businesses [1]. - Concerns about the Fed's independence in setting monetary policy may undermine confidence in U.S. financial markets and further depress the dollar's value [1]. - The Fed has made mistakes under Powell's leadership, resulting in high inflation and unclear monetary policy strategies [1][2]. Group 2: Key Policy Issues for the Next Chair - The dual mandate of the Fed—ensuring price stability and full employment—has been criticized, particularly regarding the Fed's inflation bias in 2021 and 2022, raising questions about the appropriate weighting of inflation and employment [2]. - The Fed's balance sheet has expanded significantly since the 2008 financial crisis, leading to questions about the necessary size and composition of the balance sheet for effective monetary policy [2]. - Financial regulation reforms are needed to avoid costly pressures in the U.S. Treasury market, and the Fed must distinguish its regulatory activities from monetary policy to maintain independence [2][3]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - The Fed should embrace diverse economic viewpoints to better address the evolving economic landscape and avoid groupthink tendencies that can lead to policy errors [3]. - The selection process for Fed officials should prioritize knowledge and experience diversity rather than political motivations, ensuring a broader range of perspectives [3]. - The next Fed Chair should possess knowledge of monetary policy and financial regulation, independent judgment, and an openness to new ideas that can enhance institutional performance and accountability [3].