特朗普再放狠话，中国一句“不”顶回去！这场关税博弈，美国已开始落后了

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing trade conflict between the U.S. and China is characterized by a shift in dynamics, with China appearing to gain the upper hand as it remains steadfast in its position against U.S. pressure [1][19]. Group 1: U.S.-China Trade Negotiations - The atmosphere during the recent U.S.-China trade talks was tense, with China agreeing to a 90-day tariff pause while the U.S. hesitated, indicating that any agreement required Trump's approval [4][11]. - The U.S. introduced new demands, including halting Chinese purchases of Russian and Iranian oil, framing it as a moral obligation to not support adversaries [5][6]. - China's response emphasized its commitment to national interests, stating that oil purchases are based on economic factors rather than political alignment [7][9]. Group 2: Economic Implications - China is the largest buyer of Russian oil, with daily purchases of 2 million barrels, and has acquired nearly 90% of Iran's oil exports, highlighting the economic rationale behind these transactions [7][8]. - The price advantage of Iranian oil, which is cheaper by $6-7 per barrel, illustrates the cost benefits that China prioritizes over political pressures [8][9]. - The U.S. strategy of using tariffs as leverage is undermined by China's robust supply chain and economic resilience, suggesting that tariffs alone cannot destabilize China's economy [11][12]. Group 3: Global Reactions and Alliances - Other countries, such as India and Brazil, have continued to engage in energy trade with Russia and Iran, respectively, indicating a broader resistance to U.S. sanctions [14][15]. - China's ability to withstand U.S. pressure has provided a model for other nations, encouraging them to follow suit in maintaining their economic interests [15][20]. - The U.S. finds itself in a precarious position, lacking strong allies and facing challenges in its diplomatic approach, which has led to a perception of weakness [16][17]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The trade conflict has revealed a clear distinction in strategies, with China demonstrating strategic planning and stability while the U.S. relies on threats and emotional appeals [17][18]. - Regardless of the outcome of the current negotiations, China is prepared for future actions, indicating a long-term strategy to navigate the trade landscape [21][22].