合同提前约定，外卖员工伤能获赔吗（以案说法）

Group 1 - The case involves a delivery worker, Xu, who was injured while working and sought compensation, but the company denied any labor relationship, claiming they had a cooperation agreement instead of a labor contract [1][2] - The court determined that despite the formal cooperation agreement, the nature of Xu's work, including fixed schedules and task assignments, indicated a labor relationship, thus supporting Xu's claim for recognition of this relationship [2] - Recent trends in gig economy sectors like ride-hailing and food delivery have led to new employment models, prompting the Supreme People's Court to issue guidelines for recognizing labor relationships in these contexts, ensuring workers' rights are protected [2] Group 2 - The court's ruling highlights the importance of evaluating the actual working conditions and management control to determine the existence of a labor relationship, rather than solely relying on contractual language [2] - The Supreme People's Court has released guiding cases and interpretations to clarify legal standards for labor disputes in new employment forms, indicating a shift towards better protection of workers' rights in emerging industries [2]