笔谈丨把监督触角延伸到群众身边

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for grassroots supervision to address prominent issues and weaknesses, aiming to enhance the effectiveness of grassroots governance systems and capabilities [1] - There is a call for integrating supervisory forces to overcome challenges faced by local grassroots supervision, which include a wide range of tasks and insufficient manpower [1] - The article highlights the importance of selecting and strengthening the grassroots disciplinary inspection and supervision workforce, ensuring that more experienced and trusted personnel are assigned to local levels [1][2] Group 2 - The establishment of a comprehensive supervisory mechanism is deemed essential for improving the quality and effectiveness of grassroots supervision, covering the entire process of power operation at the grassroots level [2] - The article suggests enhancing collaboration among various supervisory bodies and improving the mechanisms for local governance, including the roles of village supervisory committees [2] - It emphasizes the need for regular analysis and coordination of supervisory efforts to address personnel shortages and improve the handling of cases and clues [2] Group 3 - There are existing issues in grassroots supervision, such as inadequate problem detection and insufficient effectiveness, which necessitate a focus on improving business capabilities and overall supervisory quality [3] - The article advocates for enhancing the autonomous case-handling capabilities of grassroots disciplinary inspection agencies through comprehensive training and practical experience [3] - It stresses the importance of addressing public concerns in areas like education, healthcare, and rural revitalization, while ensuring accountability for corruption and misconduct [3]