KTV房间内激光灯致消费者手机摄像头损坏 维修费谁来承担？

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled that the KTV operator is 70% responsible for the damage to the consumer's phone camera due to insufficient warning about the risks associated with laser lights, while the consumer bears 30% of the responsibility for not paying attention to the warnings [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Details - The incident occurred when a consumer, Xiaomei, discovered purple spots on her phone's front camera after using it in a KTV room equipped with laser lights [1]. - The damage was confirmed to be caused by laser burns, as indicated by a repair shop's assessment [1][2]. - The KTV operator initially denied responsibility, claiming the laser lights were certified and that warnings were posted [2]. Group 2: Court Findings - The court found that the KTV did have laser lights installed, which could potentially damage cameras, even if not directly aimed at them [2]. - Evidence presented by the consumer, including consumption records and photo comparisons, established a strong likelihood that the damage occurred at the KTV [2]. - The court noted that the warnings provided by the KTV were not sufficiently prominent or frequent to effectively inform consumers of the risks [2]. Group 3: Liability and Compensation - The court determined that the KTV operator failed to adequately inform consumers about the risks associated with the laser lights, leading to their 70% liability [2]. - The consumer was found to have some responsibility for not heeding the warnings, resulting in her 30% liability [2]. - The total repair cost was assessed at 1198 yuan, with the KTV required to compensate the consumer 838.6 yuan [2].