广东8万亿服务业如何进化？广东人大建议探索实施“沙盒监管”

Core Insights - Guangdong's service industry is projected to reach a value of 8.14 trillion yuan in 2024, accounting for 10.6% of the national total and contributing 47.9% to GDP, maintaining its position as the leading province in service industry development for 40 consecutive years [1] - The digital economy in Guangdong has reached 6.9 trillion yuan, also ranking first in the country for eight consecutive years [1] - Challenges identified include insufficient high-quality supply in modern service industries, a shortage of skilled talent, and limited depth and breadth of openness [1] Group 1: Current State of the Service Industry - The productive service sectors, including finance, information transmission, software, and technology services, dominate the landscape [1] - There are significant gaps in the quality and capability of productive service supply to manufacturing, with critical technologies like industrial software facing bottlenecks [1] - High-end lifestyle services, such as specialized elderly care and smart elderly services, are lacking in capacity and quality, with a notable shortage of caregivers [1] Group 2: Recommendations for Development - The Guangdong Provincial People's Congress suggests accelerating the domestic replacement of high-end software industries, including basic and industrial software, and promoting the development of technology, green, and digital finance [2] - Encouragement for large manufacturing enterprises to outsource non-core businesses or establish dedicated productive service companies is recommended to strengthen the market [2] - Support for the establishment of national-level high-quality silver economy industrial parks and the promotion of elderly-friendly renovations is advised, along with securing funding for infrastructure projects [2] Group 3: Innovation and Regulatory Environment - To foster innovation in the modern service industry, the Guangdong Provincial People's Congress recommends exploring "sandbox regulation" for new technologies and business models, and establishing a fault-tolerance mechanism to encourage a more open and innovative regulatory environment [3]