特朗普终于签字，对华关税延长 90 天，还请求中国出手拉美国一把

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Trump's recent decision to extend the tariff suspension period with China for an additional 90 days, reflecting a strategic pause in the ongoing trade tensions between the two countries [2][4][23]. Group 1: Tariff Suspension - Trump's signing of the executive order to extend the tariff suspension was a last-minute decision before the expiration date, preventing a return to high tariffs of 145% on U.S. imports from China [2][4]. - The extension is seen as a tactical move to buy time for the U.S. to stabilize its trade strategy and negotiate with other countries before fully confronting China [4][6]. - The U.S. Treasury Secretary emphasized the need to prioritize domestic manufacturing before addressing trade negotiations with China, indicating a focus on internal economic recovery [4][6]. Group 2: Agricultural Trade - Trump urged China to increase its purchases of U.S. soybeans, suggesting a fourfold increase in orders, which reflects his concern over China's soybean shortage [8][10]. - Despite this request, China's imports of U.S. soybeans have been declining, with only 3 million tons sold by the U.S. as of July, the lowest in 20 years [10][12]. - Brazil has become the primary supplier of soybeans to China, accounting for nearly 70% of imports, due to competitive pricing and favorable trade conditions [10][12]. Group 3: Trade Deficit Concerns - Trump's focus on soybean orders is tied to his desire to reduce the trade deficit with China, which he perceives as unfavorable for the U.S. economy [12][14]. - The article argues that the trade deficit cannot be effectively reduced while the U.S. continues to impose tariffs on Chinese goods, which dampens demand for American exports [12][14]. - A more cooperative approach, including lifting restrictions on high-tech exports to China, is suggested as a means to address the trade imbalance [15]. Group 4: China's Response Strategy - China is adopting a cautious and strategic approach in response to Trump's fluctuating demands, emphasizing the importance of maintaining diverse trade partnerships [17][19]. - The article highlights China's efforts to deepen cooperation with other major economies, such as through the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) [19]. - China's procurement strategy for soybeans will depend on the competitiveness of U.S. offers compared to Brazilian products, indicating a focus on fair trade practices [19][21]. Group 5: Future Negotiations - The next 90 days are expected to involve ongoing negotiations between the U.S. and China, with both sides preparing for a protracted dialogue [21][23]. - The article suggests that for any meaningful progress to occur, the U.S. must approach negotiations with sincerity and a willingness to engage in equitable discussions [21][23]. - The overarching message is that cooperation, rather than confrontation, is essential for both nations to benefit and for global economic stability [23].