中方发布报告评估美式“航行自由”：延续强权逻辑 扰乱国际海洋秩序

Core Viewpoint - The report evaluates the United States' "freedom of navigation" claims and practices in relation to international treaties and general international law, suggesting that these actions are hypocritical and lack a legal basis [1][5]. Group 1: Legal Assessment - The report examines the legal stance and practices of the U.S. regarding freedom of navigation, focusing on issues such as innocent passage of warships, rescue entry, transit passage, archipelagic sea lanes, "international waters," legal status of islands, straight baselines, territorial sea baselines of distant islands, military activities in exclusive economic zones, air defense identification zones, and historic waters [1][3]. - It highlights that the U.S. has created numerous self-defined concepts and standards of customary international law that contradict international law and the practices of many countries [3]. Group 2: Implications and Critique - The report argues that the U.S. "freedom of navigation" lacks a foundation in international law and distorts the interpretation and development of international law, perpetuating a logic of "gunboat diplomacy" [5]. - It suggests that this concept serves U.S. national interests and geopolitical strategies, potentially threatening regional peace and stability while disrupting international maritime order, reflecting a clear double standard [5].