Group 1 - The U.S. has significantly increased tariffs on Indian imports to 50%, while delaying tariff plans for China by 90 days, highlighting a disparity in trade treatment [1][3] - India's exports of key products like jewelry and textiles to the U.S. could drop by up to 80% due to the new tariffs, potentially leading to a significant loss in market presence [1][4] - The Indian government has expressed strong discontent, labeling the U.S. actions as "unfair" and "unreasonable," with immediate diplomatic repercussions including the cancellation of defense talks [1][4] Group 2 - The U.S. justifies the tariffs by citing India's increased imports of Russian oil, which now constitutes 45% of India's total oil imports, a significant rise since the onset of the conflict [3][4] - India's manufacturing sector has seen a decline, with the share of manufacturing in GDP dropping to 14.3%, contrary to the government's goal of reaching 25% by 2025 [3][4] - The Indian government's initiatives to boost manufacturing have been largely ineffective, with less than 8% of promised subsidies disbursed and many projects stalled [3][4] Group 3 - Moody's has warned that the new tariffs could cause India's GDP growth to fall below 6%, severely impacting its manufacturing ambitions [4][6] - The U.S. market accounts for 18% of India's exports, and the Indian pharmaceutical sector faces challenges in finding alternative markets for its generic drugs [4][6] - The disparity in economic power is evident, as the U.S. is less reliant on Indian products compared to its dependence on Chinese manufacturing capabilities [6][8] Group 4 - The relationship between the U.S. and India is at a low point, with recent tensions reminiscent of the sanctions imposed in 1998 following India's nuclear tests [8][9] - Despite previous efforts to strengthen ties, the current geopolitical landscape, particularly regarding Russian oil imports, has strained U.S.-India relations [8][9]
为何给印加关税不给中国加?美国财长直言不讳,印度人彻底破防了,莫迪终于意识到中印差距
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-08-25 03:29