中印都买俄罗斯石油，为何美国不制裁中国？美国二把手实话实说

Group 1 - The core argument of the article is that the U.S. is strategically differentiating its approach towards India and China, particularly in the context of tariffs and sanctions related to Russian oil imports [1][3][19] - U.S. Vice President Vance indicated that the U.S. is not imposing similar sanctions on China as it has on India due to the high existing tariffs on China and the need for negotiation to end the trade war [5][11][12] - The economic interdependence between the U.S. and China complicates the imposition of sanctions, as both countries rely on each other for various goods and services, making such actions potentially self-damaging for the U.S. [6][10][11] Group 2 - The U.S. has recently canceled 91% of the tariffs imposed during the trade war, highlighting the economic damage both countries have suffered [7] - The U.S. agricultural sector, particularly in states like Iowa, is heavily reliant on the Chinese market for exports, indicating that any sanctions could lead to significant economic repercussions [7][8] - The U.S. is using tariffs on India as a strategic tool to pressure India into shifting its military procurement from Russia to the U.S., given India's heavy reliance on Russian arms [15][19] Group 3 - The article discusses India's response to U.S. tariffs, including efforts to settle oil transactions in rupees and plans to resell refined Russian oil to Europe, showcasing India's attempts to navigate the geopolitical landscape [21] - The U.S. is perceived to be selectively enforcing sanctions, focusing on India while ignoring larger Russian oil trade with Europe, which raises questions about the fairness of U.S. actions [21][15] - The overall dynamic reflects a broader geopolitical struggle where the U.S. seeks to balance its relationships with both India and China while managing its own economic interests [19][21]