中美关税延期，印度想不通，都是14亿人口大国，为何要区别对待？

Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights the contrasting treatment of India and China by the United States regarding tariffs, with India facing harsher penalties despite its deepening relationship with the U.S. [1][3] - The U.S. has imposed a total of 50% tariffs on India, including a 25% increase announced on August 1 and another 25% on August 6, while extending the suspension of 24% tariffs on China for an additional 90 days [1][5] - India's government and citizens express confusion and anger over the U.S. stance, questioning why India is being treated more harshly than China despite their growing military and economic ties [3][5] Group 2 - The article discusses the perceived unfairness in the U.S. tariff policies, noting that both India and China import energy from Russia, yet only India is being penalized, indicating a double standard in U.S. policy [8] - India's government has previously stated it would negotiate from a position of strength, which may have led the U.S. to view India as less competitive compared to China, resulting in different tariff treatments [9] - The military and economic disparities between India and China are emphasized, with India's military capabilities being questioned following recent conflicts, and China's GDP being nearly five times larger than India's, highlighting India's need to strengthen its position [9][10]