3 6 Ke·2025-08-26 01:31Group 1 - TSMC is considering returning subsidies from the CHIPS Act to avoid issues similar to those faced by Intel regarding equity disputes [1][2] - The initial agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce included $6.6 billion in direct grants and $5.5 billion in loans, which is now under reevaluation due to the implications of Intel's equity issues [1][3] - The U.S. Treasury's recent "debt-to-equity" operation with Intel, where it purchased 433 million shares at $20.47 each, has caused significant disruption in the global semiconductor industry [2][3] Group 2 - TSMC's Arizona factory construction has exceeded $10 billion in investment but is 18 months behind schedule, with critical equipment delivery times extended to 24-36 months [2] - The local supply chain in the U.S. is only meeting 15% of TSMC's raw material needs, forcing the company to rely on its Taiwanese supply system [2] - Recent subsidy guidelines from the U.S. Department of Commerce require disclosure of technology roadmaps and government oversight, which could compromise TSMC's technological autonomy by 37% and reduce patent cross-licensing by 42% [3] Group 3 - The semiconductor supply chain is experiencing fragmentation, with companies like Samsung and SK Hynix exploring negotiations for tax incentives and partnerships [4] - The EU's CHIPS Act includes provisions for a "digital sovereignty fund," allowing member states to jointly acquire strategic non-EU company stakes, seen as a defensive measure against NVIDIA's acquisition of ARM [4] - The current geopolitical landscape is pushing the Chinese semiconductor industry towards accelerated domestic production across various segments [4] Group 4 - TSMC's decision to return subsidies may protect its technological independence but could also mean forfeiting market access benefits in the U.S. [4] - Despite pressures, TSMC is likely to continue its "American TSMC" initiatives in alignment with U.S. government policies [4] - Intel's situation is viewed as an isolated case, and the U.S. government is unlikely to pursue similar equity acquisitions with other semiconductor companies [4]