“不会辞职”，美联储理事库克“硬刚”特朗普！一场制度信任的消耗战

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between former President Trump and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook highlights the tension surrounding the independence of the Federal Reserve and raises concerns about political interference in monetary policy [11][14][16]. Group 1: Events and Responses - On August 25, Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook stated that Trump has no legal authority to dismiss her and that she will not resign, emphasizing her commitment to stabilizing the U.S. economy [1]. - Trump announced Cook's dismissal via a letter on his social media platform, citing the Federal Reserve Act, which allows the president to remove a governor for "just cause" [3][8]. - The controversy began when the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency questioned Cook's handling of mortgage issues, leading to accusations of misconduct [5]. Group 2: Legal and Institutional Context - According to the Federal Reserve Act, governors serve a 14-year term and can only be removed for "just cause," which must be legally substantiated [8]. - The Supreme Court case "Humphrey's Executor v. United States" established that independent agency officials can only be removed for just cause, reinforcing the protection of Federal Reserve governors from arbitrary dismissal [8]. Group 3: Political Implications - Trump's actions are viewed as a political maneuver rather than a legal necessity, aiming to exert pressure on the Federal Reserve and influence public opinion [11][16]. - Concerns have been raised about the potential erosion of the Federal Reserve's independence, which could undermine market confidence and global monetary stability [14][16]. - The ongoing dispute between Trump and Cook represents a broader clash between political influence and the integrity of democratic institutions in the U.S. [16].