美联储理事“硬刚”拒绝辞职，民主党人谴责特朗普“厚颜无耻夺权”

Core Viewpoint - The unprecedented dismissal of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook by President Donald Trump has sparked significant backlash from Democratic lawmakers and legal experts, emphasizing the lack of legal grounds for such an action and the potential implications for the independence of the Federal Reserve [1][2][4]. Group 1: Dismissal Announcement and Reactions - Trump announced the dismissal of Cook via social media, citing allegations from Bill Pulte, the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, regarding Cook's loan applications [2]. - Cook responded firmly, stating that Trump lacks the legal authority to dismiss her without proper grounds and that she will continue her duties to support the U.S. economy [1][2]. - Democratic lawmakers condemned Trump's actions, arguing that it undermines the independence of the Federal Reserve and constitutes an illegal dismissal [4][5]. Group 2: Legal and Procedural Concerns - Legal experts, including Columbia Law Professor Lev Menand, indicated that Trump's dismissal does not meet procedural requirements, as the allegations against Cook pertain to her private life prior to her appointment [4]. - The U.S. Department of Justice has announced plans to investigate Cook, but no formal investigation has been initiated against her as of now [2]. - The legal framework allows for the dismissal of Federal Reserve governors only under specific circumstances, such as misconduct or severe dereliction of duty [2][4]. Group 3: Implications for Federal Reserve Composition - The Federal Reserve Board consists of seven members, with appointments made by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Currently, two members were appointed by Trump, and the potential dismissal of Cook could lead to a majority of Trump-appointed members [5]. - The recent resignation of another Fed governor, Adrienne Kugler, has opened the door for Trump to nominate a replacement, further shifting the balance of power within the Federal Reserve [5].