Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around the ongoing stalemate in US-China trade negotiations, with both sides refusing to compromise on key demands [1][3][10] - Trump's threats to increase tariffs on China to 200% if they do not relax their rare earth controls highlight the tension in the negotiations [8][28] - The US has been unable to make significant progress in negotiations, as evidenced by the repeated cycles of proposal, rejection, and stalling [10][12] Group 2 - The US demands include permanent exemptions from existing tariffs, which China views as a form of trade bullying [12][14] - China's strong position in the rare earth market, holding 92% of global processing capacity, gives it leverage in negotiations [14][22] - The US's insistence on China relaxing its high-tech self-innovation policies contradicts its own actions of expanding the entity list against Chinese firms [18][20] Group 3 - China's refusal to negotiate on strategic resource security indicates a firm stance against US pressure tactics [18][26] - The international community's support for China's position, with 46 WTO members expressing concerns over US tariffs, strengthens China's negotiating power [26] - The economic repercussions of Trump's tariff threats are evident, with significant losses reported by US retailers and a decline in stock market value following the announcements [28][29]
特朗普直言:中国手里有牌,美国也有!美国3大要求,中国都拒绝
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-08-26 12:12