装啥呢！美国欠37万亿还越欠越横？网友看穿真相：中国人不吃这一套了！

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the paradox of the United States' growing national debt of $37 trillion, highlighting how the country continues to spend aggressively on military and other expenditures without apparent concern for its debt levels, suggesting a unique financial strategy that turns debt into a tool for maintaining global influence and military power [3][6][20]. Group 1: Debt Dynamics - The U.S. national debt reached $36.5 trillion by March 2025, with over 70% held by domestic entities such as the Social Security system and the Federal Reserve, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of debt management [7][9]. - The article illustrates a metaphor where owing money to family members is likened to the U.S. borrowing from itself, suggesting that this internal borrowing creates an illusion of economic strength [9][10]. Group 2: Global Economic Influence - The U.S. dollar accounts for 70% of global trade settlements, and over half of central bank reserves worldwide, establishing a dependency on U.S. debt for international economic participation [10][11]. - Countries like Japan continue to purchase U.S. debt despite their own financial struggles, driven by the fear of economic instability if the dollar falters [14][15]. Group 3: Military and Economic Interplay - The U.S. military budget exceeds $1 trillion annually, which supports numerous defense contractors and political interests, creating a cycle where military spending is justified by job creation [21][23]. - The article posits that U.S. aircraft carriers serve not only as military assets but also as enforcers of dollar dominance, reinforcing the idea that military power is intertwined with economic strategy [23]. Group 4: Future Considerations - There is a noted decline in global central banks' holdings of U.S. debt, dropping from 51% in 2000 to 38%, indicating a potential shift away from reliance on U.S. financial instruments [23]. - The article raises questions about the sustainability of the U.S. debt strategy, suggesting that as more countries become disillusioned with the current system, the U.S. may face challenges in maintaining its financial dominance [23].