叛逃中国！年薪600万的华为高管，美国身份被扒后，更多猛料曝光

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the case of Zhang Kun, a former Huawei executive, who was sentenced to six years in prison for stealing trade secrets related to chip technology, highlighting the implications for the industry and the importance of protecting intellectual property rights [4][46]. Group 1: Background of Zhang Kun - Zhang Kun, a highly educated individual with degrees from Peking University and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, was a prominent figure at Huawei, earning an annual salary of 6 million yuan [2][20]. - Despite his success, Zhang Kun's decision to abandon his Chinese citizenship for American nationality raises questions about loyalty and the potential risks associated with hiring overseas talent [12][7]. Group 2: Actions Leading to Legal Consequences - In 2020, amid U.S. sanctions, Zhang Kun initiated a plan to steal Huawei's chip technology, despite having signed a non-compete agreement [22][23]. - After leaving Huawei, he founded a new company, Zunpai Communications, which quickly gained a valuation of 500 million yuan within months [25][38]. - Zhang Kun lured 13 current Huawei employees to join his new venture by offering them triple their salaries, leading to a coordinated effort to steal proprietary information [30][32]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings and Sentencing - The investigation revealed that Zunpai's new chip closely matched Huawei's technology, prompting Huawei to alert authorities, resulting in the seizure of servers and the arrest of Zhang Kun and his associates [40][42]. - After a lengthy legal process, Zhang Kun was sentenced to six years in prison and fined 3 million yuan, a penalty that many believe is insufficient given the severity of the crime [44][46]. Group 4: Industry Implications - The case underscores the critical need for stronger protections of intellectual property within the tech industry, as well as the potential consequences of hiring individuals with dual nationalities [48][49]. - The public outcry for harsher penalties reflects a growing concern over the safeguarding of technological advancements and the integrity of companies in the face of corporate espionage [46][48].