解雇美联储理事，挑战美国法律底线，专家：特朗普在“明知故犯”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the tension between President Trump's actions regarding the Federal Reserve and the recent Supreme Court ruling in the "Trump v. Wilcox" case, which emphasized the independence of the Federal Reserve despite the president's authority to dismiss other agency heads [1][3]. Group 1: Supreme Court Ruling - The Supreme Court ruled that while the president has the authority to dismiss heads of independent agencies, this does not extend to Federal Reserve members, thereby preserving the institution's independence [1][3]. - The ruling highlights the importance of maintaining the Federal Reserve's autonomy to prevent political interference in monetary policy, which could lead to long-term economic risks [3][8]. Group 2: Trump's Actions - President Trump announced the dismissal of Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook, directly challenging the Supreme Court's delineation of presidential power over the Federal Reserve [3][7]. - Trump's justification for the dismissal included allegations of misconduct, which appear to be politically motivated rather than based on substantial evidence [7]. Group 3: Legal and Economic Implications - The article notes that the Supreme Court's justices, who generally support a unified executive power theory, face criticism for their inconsistent application of this principle, especially regarding the Federal Reserve [5][9]. - The ongoing legal battle surrounding Cook's dismissal is expected to reach the Supreme Court, raising significant concerns about the future of U.S. economic policy and the potential for political manipulation of monetary policy [9].