斗争不止的特朗普，新敌人浮出水面，美媒：这种暴行百年未见

Core Points - The incident involving President Trump and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook has raised significant concerns regarding the independence of the Federal Reserve [1][3] - Trump's claim to remove Cook is based on alleged past mortgage fraud, which has not led to any criminal charges from the Justice Department [1][3] - Legal experts indicate that the President can only dismiss a Fed governor for "just cause," and Cook's alleged actions occurred before her appointment, raising questions about the legitimacy of Trump's claims [3][5] Group 1: Political Implications - The Federal Reserve Board has seven seats, with Trump having appointed two members and recently nominating a third, indicating a potential shift in the Fed's political alignment [5] - Observers suggest that Trump's actions aim to turn the Federal Reserve into a "political appendage," particularly as he pressures for interest rate cuts to manage the national debt of $36 trillion [5][7] - The market reacted with a slight increase in stock prices, reflecting speculation that Trump's influence could lead to accelerated interest rate cuts [7] Group 2: Global Reactions - The incident has prompted warnings from global financial leaders about the potential erosion of central bank independence, with concerns that it could set a precedent for political interference in monetary policy [7][8] - Historical parallels are drawn to the 1970s when political pressure on the Fed led to severe inflation, highlighting the risks of undermining central bank autonomy [7][8] Group 3: Legal Context - Cook's legal team references a 1935 Supreme Court ruling that limited presidential power over independent agency officials, suggesting that the case could escalate to the Supreme Court [8] - Despite the conservative majority in the Supreme Court, there is skepticism about whether they would support Trump's attempt to dismiss Cook, given the potential implications for institutional independence [8]