中国5A景区，越来越水了

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing number of 5A-rated tourist attractions in China, questioning their quality and authenticity as many new additions seem to lack the expected standards and have received criticism from visitors [4][9][18]. Group 1: Overview of 5A Scenic Areas - The first batch of 5A scenic areas was established in 2007, including famous sites like the Summer Palace and the Great Wall [5]. - By 2015, the number of 5A scenic areas had more than doubled, with a concentration in easily accessible regions like Beijing and the Yangtze River Delta [6]. - As of 2024, there are 358 5A scenic areas across the country, marking a peak in new additions [7][9]. Group 2: Quality Concerns - Despite the increase in quantity, the quality of many 5A scenic areas has declined, leading to public dissatisfaction [9][18]. - Notable examples of controversial 5A scenic areas include Tianya Haijiao and Yellow Crane Tower, which have been criticized for not meeting visitor expectations [10][11]. - The article highlights that many visitors feel deceived by the disparity between the advertised experience and the actual offerings of these attractions [10][11]. Group 3: Criticism of New Additions - The recent addition of 19 new 5A scenic areas has sparked significant criticism, with many being labeled as "watered-down" or lacking authenticity [18][19]. - Examples of criticized areas include Hengshui Lake, which is perceived as a generic park, and Zhoucun Ancient Commercial Street, which is seen as overly commercialized [21][22]. - The article notes that the criteria for becoming a 5A scenic area focus more on infrastructure and service quality rather than the uniqueness of the attractions [26][28]. Group 4: Visitor Experience Issues - Many 5A scenic areas face operational challenges, including poor management, cleanliness issues, and excessive commercialization, especially during peak tourist seasons [37][39]. - Visitors often report long wait times, inadequate facilities, and high prices for subpar food, leading to a negative overall experience [39][42]. - The article suggests that the disparity between the 5A rating and actual visitor experiences has led to calls for a new classification system, such as a proposed "6A" rating to better reflect quality [43][45].