特朗普一声令下，美方取消小包裹待遇，25国发起反制，输家已浮现

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration's new tariff policy eliminates the tax exemption for imported packages valued under $800, disrupting a long-standing trade practice that benefited consumers, particularly low-income households [1][2]. Group 1: Economic Impact - In 2024, the U.S. is expected to receive approximately 1.4 billion small packages, with an average value of $48 each, totaling around $65 billion [1]. - The removal of the tax exemption is projected to increase annual government revenue by about $10 billion [2]. - Consumers are likely to face significant price increases, with examples showing a rise in prices for Chinese slippers from $30 to $45 and Canadian supplements from $37 to $60, reflecting over a 50% increase [6]. Group 2: Impact on Low-Income Households - The cancellation of the tax exemption is seen as detrimental to low-income groups, with estimates suggesting that an average American household may incur an additional $2,400 in annual expenses due to increased costs [6][8]. - The policy is characterized as a trade arrangement that primarily benefits poorer consumers, and its removal is expected to disproportionately affect them [2]. Group 3: International Response - Numerous countries, including Australia, Germany, and Japan, have suspended postal services to the U.S. in response to the new policy, marking one of the largest disruptions in international postal networks in recent years [4]. - A total of 25 countries have taken similar measures, indicating widespread international discontent with the U.S. unilateral policy [4]. Group 4: Impact on Small Businesses - Many small businesses in the U.S. that rely on importing low-cost goods are facing increased operational costs and potential supply chain disruptions due to the new tariffs [8]. - The policy has led to delays in customs clearance and congestion in the customs system, further complicating business operations [8]. Group 5: Political Implications - The Trump administration's strategy appears to aim at increasing fiscal revenue while projecting a strong stance on protecting domestic industries [8]. - The policy is also seen as a means to exert pressure on international trade partners, particularly China, to curb the influx of low-cost goods [8].